celestron starsense explorer dx 102az vs 130az

Thank you in advance! We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. ), but techy enough to use either. Why you can trust Space.com He has made numerous TV appearances explaining astronomy news stories, and lectures aboard cruise ships. It seems immovable, and many beginners will wonder if they are meant to be forcing this round at all. Get the StarSense Explorer; it has better accessories and is easier to use, Ive had my 130 for so long. ), Why Is Jupiter Denser Than Saturn? Celestron Astro Fi 130mm f/5 Reflector Telescope. I recently purchased the 130mm version for a great price. Once chosen, you see a set of arrows on the screen that tells you which way to move the telescope to get to that object. Rating: 9/10. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ is an achromatic refractor, with a 102 mm doublet lens composed of two different types of glass. This is more powerful than the models above and will provide better views. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. For $399 you can get a much more capable telescope with a larger aperture, e.g. Unlike other reflectors, it uses a parabolic-style mirror inside. The StarSense Explorer DX 102 is a nice telescope, but a fully computerized instrument or a manual scope with more aperture might be a better pick. Find out more about how we test and review products. It focuses the image on a single point. Would a barlow lens be a good addition to this setup? All the following stages are accomplished using the StarSense app that you need to unlock using a code supplied with your instrument, which will work with up to five devices. we can explore many things and possible to learn new skills. This diagonal is definitely a weak link in the scope optically, and replacing it might be a good idea. All you need to do is install the app, enter the unlock code that came with your telescope, and dock the phone to your telescope. In principle, the StarSense Explorer tech is basically a bracket to point your phone at a small mirror that has been aligned to the telescope mount, and then uses the phones onboard camera and processing power to plate-solve. Celestron dx 102az has an aperture of 102 mm as the name says. This would be my first telescope and looking for Push To feature to help my 9 year old and me get into exploring the skies. Quantitative measurements of how the telescope performs in various performance categories: An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME Magazine, National Geographic, Sky & Telescope, La Vanguardia, and The Guardian. The optics are fitted into a closed tube. Includes Free. Buy Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ 102mm f/6.5 AZ Refractor Telescope featuring Use Smartphone App for Star Navigation, Follow Directions to Find Great Objects, Advanced Precise Alignment Algorithm, 102mm f/6.5 Refractor Optical Tube, Single Fork-Arm Manual Alt-Azimuth Mount, Dual Axis Slow-Motion Control Arms, Includes 26x & 66x 1.25" Eyepieces, 90 Erect-Image Diagonal, Adjustable . Once you undergo a super-simple alignment procedure, the StarSense Explorer app has thousands of objects it can find for youthe Moon, planets, most of the Messier catalog, and many more. Yes, you can take astrophotography pictures with the Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes using a smartphone adapter like this basic one or this premium one. Get to know more about us here. Not only does it have great focal specs for exploring the night sky and perhaps getting in an astro image or two, it has StarSense tech that helps a learner locate and view objects that would otherwise be difficult for a beginner to find. Any additional thoughts you have to sesparate the two? Celestrons specs say 11% obstruction by area, so the 130 loses 1460 of area = 11813, still bigger than the 102. $479.95. Its not a bad telescope to have. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. There are a few differences between each of the models, so lets look at each of them in turn to help decide whats right for you. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ vs 102AZ - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hi all, Ive been following the StarSense Explorer main thread, which has a lot of great information and seems particularly targeted towards adapting the bracket/mirror towards other telescopes. For example, if Saturn or the Andromeda galaxy are above you that night, you can select them on the app and then follow the arrows on the app to point the telescope at them. They take care of employees and no work pressure and fun at work. This means we may make a commission if you purchase an item using one of our links*. Add to Wish List. The DX 102 includes a 1.25 Amici prism star diagonal, which is mostly plastic and has some issues with glare and a diffraction spike on bright targets. Just trying to decide between a 102 refractor vs a 130 reflector. The StarSense has an Aperture of 102mm, a focal length of 650mm resulting in a focal ratio of just under f/6.5. This model and the 102 AZ are refractors. Finally, there is a standard red-dot finder to help in pointing the telescope at objects. A tabletop telescope is the best choice at this price range. It doesnt suffer from chromatic aberration and delivers a much sharper image of the night sky. To connect the Starsense app with your telescope put your smartphone in the Starsense dock. The eyepieces supplied, although in lightweight plastic barrels, are of good optical quality. Celestron - StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Smartphone App-Enabled Telescope - Works with StarSense App to Help You Find Stars, Planets & More - 102mm Refractor - iPhone/Android Compatible 4.3 out of 5 stars 274 PATENTED STARSENSE SKY RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY: This one-of-a-kind telescope uses patented, award-winning StarSense sky recognition technology and your smartphone to analyze star patterns overhead and calculate its position in real time. Within seconds, you are on target and the cross wires turn green. Similar cost. Unwary users are likely to try polishing it with glass cleaner or even abrasive solutions. However, refractors are traditionally more robust than reflectors, so there is no ideal instrument to suit everyone. We are an independent astronomy and astrophotography-focused publication that conducts objective research to make product recommendations. This means that it is larger and heavier. This forum and community is a wonderful resource! However, the system has a few notable limitations that could curtail observing sessions. Heavy and large. You need to consider where you will use and store it. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). As for what the app provides, they have database of a few hundred celestial objects so not bad for a beginner getting involved with this hobby. Then along came plate solving the software to identify a field of view of stars in a photograph and the great computing power, position sensing, and imaging capabilities of a modern smartphone. RECOMMENDED BUY FOR THE STARSENSE TECHNOLOGY. Rather, the mount uses an adapter and the computing power of your smartphone to help you find your way around the sky, which well get to after covering the basics of the telescope(s) itself. The finding system is not always spot-on, so you need to be prepared to search for objects around the edge of the field of view. The only major complaint was to do with the inaccuracy of the apps tracking ability, especially when users decided to look further out. Stargazing Help is a participant in Amazon Associates program. The device comes with 2 1.25 kellner eyepieces at 25mm and 10mm, a StarPointe red dot finderscope, a 90 degree erect image starpointer, a Manual Alt-Azimuth mount, a StarSense Explorer phone dock, a tripod and a bunch of other miscellaneous documents. You therefore get all the same advantages of a great compact Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope tube but with even higher power. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ ; Optical Design : Newtonian Reflector : Refractor : Aperture : 130mm (5.12") 102mm (4") Focal Length : 650mm (25.6") Telescope Aperture: 130mm (5.12") Focal Ratio: f/5. collimating. -cam, Zane great review as always thanks. In this article, we provide an overview of the differences between these telescopes so that you can understand the pros and cons of each. Any advice would help. The extra aperture is the main draw of the 130mm. Galaxies, nebulaes, star clusters and large parts of the messier should be viewable although there may be issues showing accurate colours with some stars. You can find the Celestron dx 130az on Aliexpress for a relatively cheaper price. Popular Science by Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 5" Smartphone App-Enabled Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope. Robin is the Vice President of the Society for Popular Astronomy, and even has an asteroid named after him (24728 Scagell), but neither the asteroid nor Robin poses a threat to civilization as we know it. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ Review (Is The, Orion EON 115ED Triplet Review (Photography Device Worth, Celestron Omni XLT 120 Review (Is It Worth The Price?! For the 102 Ill need to likely buy a star diagonal, while for the 130 Ill need to buy a Cheshire or laser collimator so still a tie. Brand new in 2022 are the two new Dobsonians in the range this Starsense Explorer 8-inch Dobsonian, and the 10-inch version covered below. This is necessary when aligning the telescope, as you need to point it at a recognizable object at the start of observing. This StarSense Explorer DX 102 review was written in January 2020, when the scope was first released for $399. So, what is so special about the Celestron dx eyepieces? Celestron dx 130az has a focal ratio of f/5. Your smartphone's camera must be sensitive enough to image the brighter stars on a night setting. The larger the aperture is, the brighter you can see in the telescope. Winner: Even for this round the clear winner is Celestron Starsense Explorer dx 130az. Once set up, you need to align the red-dot finder with the main instrument by day. I have two young kids (between 5-10 years old) and would like to try and get them interested. The StarSense has an Aperture of 102mm, a focal length of 650mm resulting in a focal ratio of just under f/6.5. How this StarSense technology works is actually very similar to what can be referred to as plate-solving. In short, this is a brilliant telescope for viewing the night sky. Which eyepieces would you suggest to replace those less-than-ideal ones that come with the Stars Sense 130? The Starsense app will work with most of the telescopes that have computerised mounts. There is no reason at all to get the StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ. The 130 is better but still pretty small for that price. This is the simplest form of mounting and is particularly suitable for a beginners instrument. Our Verdict: The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102 AZ telescope is a beginner's ultimate telescope. There's also the Explorer DX 130AZ . These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). Smartphones can be fitted into a spring-loaded slider on the StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ, allowing for basic astrophotography. So, the technology in essence uses your phone to take occasional snapshots of the night sky to locate objects however, as phones cant really sustain battery for long periods whilst taking images, the snapshots arent taken all the time. will also probably upgrade in 5 years or so. Which makes it better for planetary views. On your phones screen, youll see the current position of your telescope. Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron NexStar 130 SLT vs Celestron 130 vs Celestron DX 102AZ . Before the purchase, be sure to install the StarSense Explorer app on your phone. Overall, this is a brilliant option if you want near-perfect viewing of planets and galaxies and have the space to use it. The prowess of the instrument is more suited to beginners than to dedicated observers. The Celestron StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ is different from the models above in that it is a reflector telescope. However, there are some key differences between them. Its focal length is about 650 mm. (Assume eyepieces are upgrade on either scope of course). Modified vs Unmodified DSLR Astrophotography: The Ultimate Showdown! The details will be a lot better than dx 102az. I guess at the end of the day, I'm curious if either the refractor or reflector is known to be a lot easier with kids; and whether the refractor tends to be a better fit for beginners. These are very average specs and maybe even subpar when you consider reflector telescopes tend to offer a lot more bang for the buck nevertheless, the specs should be competent for beginners. Just recently purchased DX130. The StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ is a Newtonian reflector telescope with a 5.1-inch aperture. Patented, award-winning StarSense sky recognition technology uses your smartphone to analyze star patterns overhead and calculate the telescope's position in real-time. After much debate, we finally know everything that there is to know regarding the two telescopes. The StarSense Explorer DX-102 is limited to brighter objects by the nature of its small aperture. Between Celestron Starsense dx 102az and 130az, Celestron dx 130az is better. I had what seemed to be a related question, which has come up somewhat in that main thread: whether to purchase the DX 130AZ vs 102AZ? A 32mm Plossl will provide 20x, with a slightly wider true field than the included 25mm ocular, but is of debatable usefulness. . The 8-inch aperture is huge and will provide few limitations to what you can see. Many people have asked on astronomy forums and contacted Celestron themselves, asking why the bracket and code cannot be sold as a stand-alone item. ), Deimos vs Saturn (How Are They Different? Which is stark opposite to Celestron dx 130az. Dx 102azs optical design also has chromatic aberration issues. Therefore these models will suit those where space is at a premium at home and would prefer something smaller, easier to store, and more portable. The 102 refractor will have CA on bright objects, while the 130 reflector will need (regular?) The camera views the sky through a mirror, enabling you to view the phones screen at a convenient angle. So undoubtedly, Celestron dx 130az is the winner. This scope has taught me so much, I can travel with it on hikes, and Im impressed. Here is a quick video that shows how this works: This is a great, innovative feature that takes advantage of the smartphone that you probably already own, and gives you something simpler and cheaper than a fully computerized telescope. Avoid! document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. All the telescopes from Celestron Edge HD and Schmidt-Cassegrain are compatible with the Starsense app. It would kill your phone quite fast. You can unsubscribe at any time. There is a great deal on a Celestron 102 DX at Amazon for $359, only 50 dollars more than the Popular . In this range, the 80 mm refractor and 114 mm reflector are supplied on lighter-weight mountings, while the 102 mm refractor and 130 mm reflector have the same heavier mounting. All of this requires some user input namely the date and time, the location, and choosing the stars. The plate-solving is only done when you first mount your phone or when you move the telescope a significant amount. Trying to decide between these 2 scopes Im finding it difficult. Unfortunately, the adjustment range on the device supplied did not allow it to be aligned accurately, and for the test, we used another one that we already had. Are Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes computerized / GOTO? If you compare their size, 130az is quite big and heavy. Overall, while it would not always be our first choice, the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102 is definitely one of my favorite beginner scopes in its price range. But they take more time to set on the mount than dx 102az usually takes. Overall, if you have the budget then it makes sense to get the higher aperture DX6 over the DX5 as it will provide better views. Value $12.60. The instrument comes in just two main parts the tripod and the tube assembly so it seems straightforward to assemble. You Pay: $559.00. Optically the telescope is well up to standard for a short-focus achromatic refractor and is well-suited to deep-sky observing. This means we may be compensated if you click links on this page at no extra cost to you. And the Celestron Starsense Explorer dx 130az has a 10mm Kellner eyepiece with 65x magnification power. The StarSense Explorer app is ridiculously easy to set up. All these instruments are standard members of the Celestron range and are available in other mounting packages. Especially the Starsense explorer dx 120az and 130az. Celestron has been attempting to use various methods of technological assistance for the past two decades first with the NexStar series of telescopes and SkyAlign (to mixed results), then with their StarSense technology (a flop), their AstroFi and NexStar Evolution telescopes, and now the StarSense Explorer. One major source of problems is the mirror that is crucial to finding objects. The StarSense Explorer DX 102 includes two 1.25 eyepieces: a 25mm Super Konig providing 26x and a 10mm Konig providing 65x. The optical quality is good for a telescope of this type, but for planetary observing a different instrument would be preferable, such as the 130 mm reflector in the same range. The reason why this is a problem is because simply adjusting the axis to allow for a more smooth motion may take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour to do. The model I tested is the Explorer DX 102AZ refractor telescope ($400). The images will generally be sharper because misalignment isnt very common, Refractor based devices tend to be more expensive than their similarly powered reflector counterparts (A 4 inch reflector may only set you back $100 one example being the. Same focal length. COAST HX4 Dual-Color Utility Beam LED Clip Light. The pros of the lens included within the StarSense include the following : Overall, even though the optics within this telescope arent necessarily the most accurate when it comes to colours, it will still provide a solid experience for most. Its focal length is about 650 mm. The 5 reflector seems like a solid scope. Also I dont speak for Celestron and to prove so I will say the eye pieces are complete trash and it should come with a collimating tool. This is exactly the same model from Celestron just being sold with different marketing and so is worth comparing the prices to find the best deal. ==>Click Here To Check TheCelestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZsPricing On Amazon! HIGH-QUALITY 102MM REFRACTOR: Fully coated glass optics provide bright, sharp, clear views of craters on the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and deep sky objects like the Orion Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy, and Pleiades Open Star Cluster. Optical Design: Newtonian Reflector. The alt-azimuth mounting means that you can move the instrument around two axes up and down (altitude) and from side to side (azimuth). The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ telescope is all about the smartphone app used to align it, though it's a more manual affair than you might expect. In addition, the faster focal ratio of F/6.5 will also make it better at taking astrophotography images. You can zoom in for better precision. The eyepiece for the 102mm will be better positioned for the little one. Today's best Celestron StarSense DX 102AZ deals, We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices, Today's best Celestron 31145 NexStar 130 SLT Series Newtonian Reflector Telescope deals, Today's best Celestron NexStar 102SLT Computerized Telescope deals. You cant also take pictures of the sky with the help of the telescope. +91-120-406-2000.

Nailea Devora Hair Color, Bonsai By Edith Tiempo Analysis, Russell Poole Death Scene, Articles C